Wednesday, January 4, 2017

Opinion: Canada's Senate enters 2017 embracing a new openness


Opinion: Canada's Senate enters 2017 embracing a new openness
 
The Senate of Canada is now arguably the most social-media-friendly legislative assembly in the world, Senator Leo Housakos writes. Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS

ShareAdjustCommentPrint

In order to know where the Senate is going in 2017, one need only look where we went in 2016.

As members of Canada’s “House of Sober Second Thought,” we’ve faced our challenges. We’ve heard Canadians. And we have continued to make changes to better meet Canadians’ expectations.
Canadians work hard to provide for their families. They pay taxes with the expectation that their money will be used respectfully and prudently.

That’s why we’re ensuring transparency and accessibility go hand in hand with good governance.

As chair of both the Senate Committee on Internal Economy, Budgets and Administration and the Senate Subcommittee on Communications, I am proud of the steps my colleagues and I are taking to ensure greater accountability to and dialogue with Canadians.


It starts with complete openness.

Did you know Canadians can now attend the meetings of our Internal Economy Committee or listen in real time? Our committee then uploads audio and full transcripts from these meetings to our website as quickly as we can translate them into both official languages.

We took this unprecedented step of opening up our meetings so Canadians can see and hear not only how their tax dollars are being put to use, but also how and why those decisions are made.
Meanwhile, the House of Commons’s equivalent Board of Internal Economy is held in private and prefers to upload selective minutes of meetings after months of delay.

Furthermore, the Senate adopted a new method of disclosing information about each senator’s expenses. A more detailed breakdown of senators’ travel expenses and service contracts are available online. Senators’ attendance records are now also published online.

To match the increased spirit of transparency, we have built on our commitment to better communicate the work done in the Senate with Canadians.

The result has been a communications strategy that is truly reflective of the 21st century — including live-tweeting the progress of legislation during debates in the chamber and livestreaming news conferences and discussion panels.

The Senate shares content on Facebook. We post photos on Instagram. We publish content almost daily to SenCAPlus, our new digital magazine.

The Senate of Canada is now arguably the most social-media-friendly legislative assembly in the world.

These formal changes have helped us highlight the strong substance of the upper chamber.

And this substance is as critical as ever.

When debating Bill C-14, the government’s medical assistance in dying legislation, senators dove into the deep ethical dimensions of the legislation. Important amendments were made and accepted by the House of Commons, including barriers on beneficiaries’ ability to incite the assisted death of a loved one, requirements that palliative care be offered first and the creation of a timeline for independent study once legalized.

Much of our work takes place in Senate committees, which release regular substantive reports on issues that affect Canadians.
Recent reports have covered a variety of subjects, such as protecting intellectual property, reducing internal trade barriers and creating a pipeline strategy that balances economic growth, environmental protection and indigenous rights.

This is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the serious work senators do to fill gaps left by the more populist lower chamber.
The upper chamber is an institution that forms part of the bedrock of our country, as the Fathers of Confederation so aptly stressed.

The Senate has always had a vital constitutional role to play in deliberating over House of Commons legislation, proposing its own legislation and in conducting in-depth, independent research on public issues.

Going into 2017, we’re confident that the Senate’s improved and improving openness will continue to a go a long way in helping Canadians see how essential and responsive our institution is.

Senator Leo Housakos served as Senate Speaker; he is the chair of the Senate Committee on Internal Economy, Budgets and Administration and the Subcommittee on Communications and he represents the division of Wellington in Quebec.

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

How the Senate changed in 2016 — and what it means for the government’s agenda for 2017

How the Senate changed in 2016 — and what it means for the government’s agenda for 2017


http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/how-the-senate-changed-in-2016-and-what-it-means-for-the-governments-agenda-for-2017

A view of the Senate chamber.
Andrew Forget/Postmedia/FileA view of the Senate chamber.   
 

OTTAWA — 2016 was a transformative year for Canada’s Senate, and a revitalized upper chamber will likely exert even more influence on the federal government’s agenda in 2017.

Senators of all stripes, including the new contingent of independents the Liberal government has appointed, appear to be reinterpreting the chamber’s “sober second thought” mandate in a more activist light. Here’s what you need to know about the year Canadian senators just had, and what may lie ahead:

It’s independents’ day
Postmedia and Canadian Press files
Postmedia and Canadian Press filesSeven of the new senate appointees. Top row, from left to right: Raymonde Gagne, Justice Murray Sinclair, V. Peter Harder, and Frances Lankin. Bottom row, from left to right: Ratna Omidvar, Chantal Petitclerc, and Andre Pratte.

Stephen Harper left a lot of seats empty in the red chamber, and his successor Justin Trudeau has filled 28 of them via an independent advisory board. That process, especially for the 21 appointed this fall after an open application process, wasn’t without criticism, since many believed the appointees reflected small-l liberal values.


Still, public polling favours a less-partisan Senate, and independents now form the biggest group in the chamber. Most are now part of a formal Independent Senators Group, led by “facilitator” Sen. Elaine McCoy. They say they won’t vote together, unless it’s on Senate rules and logistics to help them operate in what’s always been a two-party system.

A new round of applications launched in December for six more vacancies anticipated next year: one in New Brunswick, two in Ontario and three in Nova Scotia. At least one average Joe who didn’t get appointed in the last round, an Ottawa hot dog vendor, said he’ll re-apply.
 
Meanwhile, senators continue to discuss how the chamber should work. The Independent Senators Group will hold meetings Feb. 2 and 3 to “define their vision of the Senate of the future,” according to a recent press release.

And in December, independent senators struck two important deals with the their Liberal and Conservative counterparts: one to increase the size of Senate committees so a proportionate number of independents would sit on them, and another to give independent senators an office budget for the first time ever.

 A Senate staffer confirmed the independent caucus will have a budget of $722,000 for 2017/18 — still less than the more-than-$1-million partisan caucuses get.

The Senate is reforming itself — or trying to

Adrian Wyld / The Canadian Press
Adrian Wyld / The Canadian PressJustin Trudeau has said he wants the Senate to be truly independent, not an appendage of the governing party.

Its communications branch has been overhauled and now produces infographics, live-tweets debates and gets Senators to sing carpool karaoke.

Starting last fall, the Senate started requiring proactive disclosure from all senators’ offices, including detailed financial information — one way they’re trying to exorcise ;the ghosts of expense scandals past.

And in October, a first report from the Senate’s modernization committee suggested a swath of changes that could further upset the status quo, including the overhaul of Senate spending rules, formalizing the election of a speaker (rather than appointment by prime minister), mandating the appearance of government ministers to answer questions, and televising Senate proceeedings.


The debate over logistics is also far from over. While Peter Harder, the government’s representative in the Senate, has said the chamber will no longer be home to the government-versus-opposition Westminster model, senators from both parties are defending the need for an organized group to poke holes in government legislation.

They’re changing government bills — and beating them to the punch

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press
Adrian Wyld/The Canadian PressA Senate committee has said some government legislation must be split into smaller bills to be dealt with fairly.
 

The newly independent-minded Senate has exerted more influence over government bills than has been seen in recent memory.

During a debate over physician-assisted dying law in May and June, the Senate sent amendments back to the House of Commons that would have changed the bill to more closely align it with a Supreme Court decision (and therefore the constitution). The amendments were largely rejected, but it was a first major wake-up call for a Commons unused to pushback from senators.

Then the Senate finance committee spurred the government to amend its budget implementation bill, C-29, to preserve provincial consumer protection. It also voted to amend tax bill C-2 to shift more savings to people at the lower end of the middle tax bracket, though the Senate’s speaker ruled the amendment out of order (tax measures can’t originate from the Senate).

Most recently, the Senate aboriginal peoples committee sent a letter to Indigenous Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett asking the government to get a court extension and fix its bill on gender discrimination in Indian Act registration, S-3 — which originated from the Senate.


Five bills are now making their way through the Senate and a bunch more are coming, including C-22, a controversial bill that would establish a parliamentary oversight committee for Canada’s security and intelligence agencies.

Meanwhile, the Senate’s still waiting to hear back on another one of the bills it amended. In June, the Senate changed C-7, the RCMP union bill, to remove exemptions from what can be brought up in collective bargaining. But the House of Commons still hasn’t come back with a decision on whether to accept or reject that amendment. Watch for a conclusion early in 2017, when Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale is expected to revisit the file.

Email: mdsmith@postmedia.com | Twitter: mariedanielles

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

Is PMO Directing Destruction of Opposition in Parliamentary Chamber?




Conservative senator accuses Trudeau of trying to 'destroy' opposition in the Senate
In apparent breach of Senate rules, Denise Batters films partisan video inside upper chamber

By Chris Rands, CBC News Posted: Dec 21, 2016 6:06 PM ET Last Updated: Dec 21, 2016 8:56 PM ET

Conservative Denise Batters posted a YouTube video Dec. 21, 2016, accusing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of trying to eliminate opposition in the Senate.

Conservative Denise Batters posted a YouTube video Dec. 21, 2016, accusing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of trying to eliminate opposition in the Senate.



More than 2,700 Canadians applied to be senators
Independent senators given $700K budget as non-partisan vision for Red Chamber takes hold

Independents turning Senate into '$90M debating club,' top Liberal senator says

New Senate picks 'closeted Liberals,' top Tory senator says as Independents become largest bloc
Trudeau's representative wants Senate organized by region, rather than along party lines




In a video posted to YouTube Tuesday that may violate Senate rules, Conservative Senator Denise Batters accuses Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's office of trying to eliminate opposition in the upper chamber.

In her 65-second video, Batters refers to Trudeau's controversial past comments about communist China and Cuba's late dictator, Fidel Castro.

"We know that Prime Minister Trudeau is a fan of communist China's efficiency, and that he called Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, a Trudeau family friend, a 'remarkable leader,'"Batters says.

Independents given $700K budget as non-partisan vision takes hold
New Senate picks 'closeted Liberals,' top Tory says
Senate could be headed for showdown as Independents push for more control

"Opposition in the Senate might be inconvenient for the Trudeau government, but we have a critical role to play in protecting Canadian democracy: to hold the government accountable and to voice minority and regional views not represented in the majority Liberal government in the House of Commons."

Standing on the opposition side of the Senate chamber and speaking directly into the camera, Batters says she is concerned that Senator Peter Harder, the government's representative in the Senate, wants to do away with an organized official opposition, as she gestures to the empty chairs behind her.

"This is Canada, a free, democratic country. We must not allow the Trudeau government to destroy the opposition in a democratic chamber of Parliament, emptying these opposition benches forever."

Harder's office said he had no comment on the video.

Batters, who was picked by Stephen Harper to represent Saskatchewan in the Senate, is known as a strong defender of her party.
The Conservative opposition in the Senate have viewed Trudeau's appointments of Independent senators with great suspicion.
The Conservatives have sparred with the Independents over membership in Senate committees, which are the prime vehicle for examining legislation.

Cameras rarely allowed in the Senate

Filming in the Senate is strictly controlled by the Speaker, and the red chamber remains off-limits to all cameras while in session. Debates can only be heard on an audio webcast.

When asked about filming a partisan message inside the Senate chamber, Batters said in a statement, "The Senate is a partisan, political institution. I have previously made exactly these same comments during debate and in question period in the Senate chamber.

"I followed the appropriate approval process for senators to use the Senate chamber, and I chose that locale to illustrate the visual of a Senate chamber with no opposition."

Senate Speaker George Furey's office said in a statement, "Senator Batters had requested the use of the Senate chamber for the purposes of recording a video on a different topic. In general, the Senate chamber is not used for the filming of partisan videos when the Senate is not in session."

In response to that statement, a spokeswoman for Batters said that while arranging for the video to be shot in the chamber "no one asked the topic of Senator Batters' video, nor was the information offered."

The Senate is expected to open the red chamber to television cameras when it moves in the coming months to a temporary location to allow for decade-long renovations to Centre Block. The temporary location in Ottawa's former train station is being designed to allow for live broadcasting of the Senate's proceedings.
Senate Opposition Leader Claude Carignan was not available to comment.

Senator Harder on a year of change for the Senate

 Senator Harder on a year of change for the Senate  


    www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senator-harder-on-a-year-of-change-for-the-senate-1.3908089

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Senators divided on question of whether they should be part of political parties

National Post

Senators divided on question of whether they should be part of political parties

Marie-Danielle Smith | November 30, 2016 7:08 PM ET
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/senators-divided-on-question-of-whether-they-should-be-part-of-political-part
OTTAWA — 
 As a modernization committee debates the future of the Senate with no conclusion in sight, the leader of the Senate Liberals argued Wednesday that senators shouldn’t be discouraged from banding together along partisan lines.

“We are being encouraged to transform the Senate by eliminating the usual features of the Westminster parliamentary model,” said Sen. Joseph Day, who leads a group of senators that aligns itself with the Liberal Party but does not represent the government or sit with Liberal MPs in a caucus.

Freedom of assembly is a Charter right, Day said, and should prevent any attempts to reform the Senate in a way that forbids partisan organization. And if the government has a representative in the chamber to present its legislation —

 Sen. Peter Harder, sworn-in in March — then Day argued the official opposition should be represented officially as well.

Not everyone agrees with that idea. Some, including Harder, are aiming for a Senate with no political party caucuses, made up of independents. 

But as the committee met Wednesday, Day argued Harder’s motives seem unclear.

“He is speaking on behalf of the government and encouraging us to model ourselves in the image the government is creating for us,” Day said. “If we agree to go down that road, whose interests will we be serving?”

He argued the vision articulated by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when he was in opposition could in fact make it harder for the Senate to act as a check on power because senators may not be organized enough to present arguments against a bill.

But Day doesn’t want to see the Senate infected by the hyper-partisanship of the House of Commons either, and argued that Conservative senators should sever their caucus ties with their Commons counterparts.

The committee is meeting during a time of upheaval in the Senate; Trudeau’s Liberals in the House have severed official ties with their former caucus mates in the Senate, and 21 recently-named independent senators, along with seven appointed in March, upset a status quo where almost all senators were either Conservative or Liberal — and either in government or in opposition, depending on who held the balance of power in the House of Commons.

There was some debate among committee members over what the formal role of the opposition in the Senate should be. Some senators, like Conservative Sen. Stephen Greene, think Harder and two others who act as government representatives (they call themselves the G3) should be matched by a trio of official opposition representatives (“the O3,” suggested Liberal Sen. Art Eggleton).

Still, Sen. Diane Bellemare, one of the G3, replied that this is a period of transition for the Senate and that it is the public who want to see a more nonpartisan Senate, or at least one that doesn’t need political parties to function.

The co-ordinator of the independents’ group, Sen. Elaine McCoy, said that senators “can’t rely simply on the official opposition for all of us to do our jobs as scrutineers.”

As the longest-serving senator, Anne Cools, pointed out, none of this has been debated on the Senate floor itself, only in committee. And heading into December, senators remain nowhere near agreement on what the Senate should look like, though the chamber’s makeup has already changed dramatically.
Email: mdsmith@postmedia.com |

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

SENATE OF CANADA MUST READ

The Senate – An Essential House of Parliament

    http://www.revparl.ca/37/1/37n1e_14_kinsella.pdf

Why is the Senate of Canada so essential?

  https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-senate-canada-so-essential-alexis-david-fafard

Liberals are expected to appoint 20 new senators within weeks

Toronto Star

Liberals are expected to appoint 20 new senators within weeks

Justin Trudeau’s independent Senate gamble will be put to the test once independent senators outnumber Conservatives and Liberals.
OTTAWA—Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is expected to name 20 new “non-affiliated” or “independent” senators in a matter of weeks.

The government had pledged to fill the remaining Senate vacancies, including six for Ontario, by the end of the year. But a source familiar with the process said the Liberals want to move quickly to fill those 20 seats.

The move would mean that, for the first time in the Senate’s history, non-affiliated senators will outnumber their Conservative or Independent Liberal counterparts with a plurality of seats. And it will also put to the test Trudeau’s gamble to make the upper chamber more respectable in the eyes of Canadians.


Peter Harder, the Liberal government’s representative in the Senate, expects recommendations from an arm’s-length advisory board on Senate appointments to land on the prime minister’s desk within weeks.


“I think the new senators will give an added impetus of change or reform and renewal to the institution,” Harder said in an interview Monday.

 
“This is a change in progress. The modernization of this institution to make it an independent, non-partisan, accountable, transparent and complimentary body is a work in progress. And we’re looking for opportunities to work with all senators to achieve that objective.”


Against the backdrop of the Senate expense scandal in January 2014, Trudeau, then in opposition, announced that Liberal senators would no longer be welcome to caucus with their House of Commons colleagues.


After the Liberals took power two years later, Democratic Institutions Minister Maryam Monsef put in place a new arm’s-length system to appoint senators, rather than picking from the usual ranks of party stalwarts, fundraisers, and friendly journalists or lawyers.

 
In March, Trudeau appointed seven new senators, including Harder, former provincial NDP cabinet minister Frances Lankin, and Ratna Omidvar representing Ontario.


With the new batch of senators appointed, Trudeau will have appointed 27 to the upper chamber in his first year in power. Former prime minister Stephen Harper appointed 59 over almost a decade in power, but that number was kept low by Harper’s steadfast refusal to appoint new senators while the expense scandal embroiled his government.


Conservative Senator Leo Housakos, a former Senate Speaker and chair of the chamber’s powerful internal economy committee, said that he’s heard the new appointments will be made “imminently.”
Housakos, a critic of the Liberals’ Senate proposal, said the new dynamic in the upper chamber will make the operations of that place more difficult.


“The difficulty, and they’re starting to recognize it themselves, is that it’s hard to operate in the British parliamentary system without clusters and caucuses,” Housakos said in an interview Tuesday.
“A lot of the decision (about) who sits on (Senate) committees are taken by caucuses, are taken by collectively within groups of like-minded senators.

So when someone says that a senator is independent, do you think that Justin Trudeau is going to be appointing to the Senate right-of-centre politically minded people? Or do you think there’s a great likelihood that, like the last batch, he will be appointing left-of-centre, social liberal-minded individuals?”


The Star requested comment from the Prime Minister’s Office for this article, asking whether Trudeau has made his selections or when those decisions will be made. In response, the Privy Council Office — public servants who support the prime minister — suggested the final decisions had not yet been made.


“The process being led by the Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments is ongoing,” PCO spokesperson Raymond Rivet wrote in a statement.

“The government has indicated that it intends to fill the current Senate vacancies by the end of 2016.”